POP Editorial Services LLC | Self-Editing Tip: Give Your Manuscript Time to Simmer
self-editing tips, publishing, editors, indie publishing
single,single-post,postid-86124,single-format-standard,ajax_fade,page_not_loaded,,select-theme-ver-1.8,vertical_menu_enabled, vertical_menu_width_400,side_menu_slide_from_right,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-4.12,vc_responsive

My No. 1 Self-Editing Tip: Give Your Manuscript Time to Simmer

Self-editing is key to good writing, and good writing is like good pasta sauce. The ingredients are simple enough — tomatoes, garlic, onion, basil, oregano, salt, pepper — yet the range and breadth of flavors that can be created with these seven ingredients are enough to fill an entire section of the grocery store.

pasta sauce

Image by Jessyratfink

What all good sauces have in common, and good books too, is that they were allowed to simmer so that the flavors could meld. If you are hoping for a positive end result, one thing you can’t do, whether in writing or in cooking, is hurry.
My number one self-editing tip? Give your manuscript time to simmer.
Generally speaking, both fiction and nonfiction require some level of research. Although the demands for these two genres are different, good research is nonetheless important for the satisfaction of your readers.
During the writing process, you may be tempted to insert your newfound knowledge without much synthesis. This can become a major stumbling block for your readers. Why? When you don’t allow yourself time to process the information you have gathered, you are likely to abruptly switch between the technical aspects of the research and your natural writing style.
Further, readers may find themselves distracted by the digressions into historical or technical background. Whereas you, the author, may have intended to create a richer description of a person, place, or thing, the result may leave readers wondering what this detail has to do with the rest of the story.
This problem occurs in every kind of writing.
As the author, you have to make sure your thoughts are flowing clearly from one to the next and that your inclusion of research improves the reading experience rather than hurting it. With multiple revisions over several weeks, there will be no obvious patchwork, no raw spices.
Researching while you write is a contributing factor to this problem, and it can easily lead to the worst gaff that can come from hurrying your writing: plagiarism. With so much material online, it is too easy to simply copy and paste someone else’s words and pass them off as your own. Avoid the temptation by allowing yourself time to fully understand what you have learned before you attempt to use it.
But it’s not just research that needs this simmering time. The manuscript as a whole needs a chance to meld. If it took you a long time to get all of the pieces together—many writers report spending five years or more writing their books—once you type “The End” you may want to jump into editing. Hold on! Give that work of yours some room, come back to it when you can read it from beginning to end, and fix any glitches.
Setting a project aside for a time to give yourself a fresh perspective may seem like a luxury.
Publishers have schedules and they expect their authors to adhere to them. Others might look to some of the prolific best-selling authors, the ones who put out multiple books a year, for examples of when this rule does not apply. Here are my thoughts on those caveats.
First, if your publisher is asking for a book in a faster timeline than you can manage and still write a good book, you need to

  1. take that into consideration the next time you negotiate a contract, and
  2. ask for an extension.

Although I always encourage my authors to meet their deadlines, I have to also admit that a good 50 percent of the books I have edited over the past 17 years have been behind schedule at some point. So, if you need more time in order to make a great product, ask for it. You won’t be the first author to miss a deadline.
And second, if you aren’t James Patterson, then you shouldn’t expect to produce books the way he does. Many of the top-producing best-selling authors have ghostwriters. You will also notice that the quality of the books tends to suffer over time. Plots are formulaic, story lines digress, and you wonder if the editor was sleeping on the job. It’s clear the author’s name recognition is what sells these books.
Although you have a slim chance of reaching fame and fortune churning out book after book, if you have to sacrifice the quality of your writing, and thereby risk your reputation, in order to do it, I’m not sure it’s worth it.
I offer you one more reason to take your time while you write. Traditional publishing houses do not spend as much time or money on editing as they used to. The large presses only accept books that are in tiptop shape (unless you’re James Patterson).
Smaller presses may accept your work but offer little in the way of editing assistance. In both cases, that means it’s up to you to deliver a manuscript that is very nearly publication-ready. That only happens when you take your time. (Self-publishers keep their own schedules; no excuses for rushing when you’re the publisher!)
Of course, this is all coming from a woman who quit her job as an in-house editor because, as a member of the quality control team, she was unhappy with the quality of books the house was producing. I work for myself now. That means I control the quality of my writing and editing and I can take pride in whatever comes out of my office. It’s a good feeling, one that I believe every author should aspire to.
Perfect BoundLike this blog? Find more advice and insights in the award-winning book Perfect Bound: How to Navigate the Book Publishing Process Like a Pro, available through Hop On Publishing, Amazon.com, Barnes and Noble, Novel Books, and other fine retailers

Katherine Pickett
  • Good post! Just this morning, I heard a podcast with TS Paul on Mark Dawson’s Self Publishing Formula. He’s the total opposite of the blog post you just wrote. https://selfpublishingformula.com/category/podcast/
    Sometimes, it’s good to take a break from a project, let it simmer, then see it again with “fresh eyes.” It’s so important to produce the best quality book possible.

    May 2, 2017 at 8:55 pm
  • Dan Nelson

    Hi Katherine,

    I’m sure this is all good advice. It also seems to have a flipside. It seems somewhat common for new writers to set for themselves the goal of making their first book a literary masterpiece of the ages. I don’t know the statistics, but common sense seems say that learning to write like a seasoned pro usually requires at least multiple full cycles: from concept to first draft to revisions to editing to publishing to reviews and feedback.

    There are rare cases in which a great author has produced a masterpiece as his or her only book (e.g., Harper Lee), or as his or her first book. Often one seems to find that these authors had many false starts over many years, or that they more or less extensively self-published their preprofessional work by circulating it widely among friends and family. Either way, they drove many projects to some state of completion and received significant feedback prior to their first real masterpiece.

    For what it’s worth, my experience has led to a formula for success that goes something like this: (1) Begin with a goal of accomplishing something (e.g., a novel). (2) Choose a project that is well within your capabilities. (3) Do the best work you know how at the time while learning whatever you can as you go. (4) Keep your momentum and drive the project to completion. (5) Mull over everything you learned in the process. (6) Repeat steps 1-5.

    This formula comes mainly from my work in other creative endeavors. I’m still somewhat new to writing. My first novel is nearing POD publication. I’m happy with it as a first effort, My second novel is well along in the revision process, almost ready for editing. I’m drafting a third novel. I can honestly say that each new book has grown in length, sophistication, and ambition over the previous one. I’ll be happy to put my name on all of them, and I believe they’ll all be worth reading. But I also believe I’m improving as an author with each new effort.

    Another point I might add is that having multiple books in the pipeline has worked well for me. Each waits its turn while I go off and work on another. That gives each its stewing time while still allowing me to make writing progress every day. It helps especially when you get to the point where other professionals are involved–editors, photographers, visual artists, etc. I’ve found that I can spend a lot of time waiting for external work items to turn around. It’s most productive to have something to work on in the meantime.

    I tend to research both in preparation for writing and as I go, but hopefully everything (or nearly everything) is ultimately blended and smoothed over in the revision process. I’ve never copy/pasted anything from an outside source into my books that was not a direct quote. Of the other writers I’ve personally met, I’m sure 100% would truthfully say the same.

    Best Regards,

    May 15, 2017 at 2:11 pm

Post a Comment